FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section C

Full Board Details for Round 4

FREQUENCY CHART FOR BOARDS 1 TO 8

Round 4

Bd	Score	No		Score	No		Score	No		Score	No		Score	No		Score	No		Score	No		Score	No		Score	No
1	-400	1		-170	1		-150	1		-130	1		-110	1		-50	1		110	1		140	1		170	1
2	620	1		630	3		650	2		660	2		690	1
3	-200	1		-50	7		800	1
4	-300	2		-110	2		-100	2		100	2		200	1
5	-1210	1		-450	4		-420	3		-400	1
6	-650	2		-620	6		-300	1
7	-300	1		-100	3		140	1		620	1		630	2		660	1
8	-170	1		-140	2		-90	1		50	3		100	2

29 ANN AXELBY & JILL BRAITHWAITE

Round 4

vs 34 ANTON & GREGOR FORSTER-ROHAL

NS 15		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section C
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 NS	3 E+2	10	-150	25%	5 NS	6 xE=	A	-1210	0%
2 NS	3NTN+2	J	660	82%	6 NS	4 E=	K	-620	57%
3 NS	3NTS-1	A	-50	50%	7 NS	3NTS+2	3	660	100%
4 NS	2NTE-1	Q	100	82%	8 NS	3 E-1	10	50	63%
Percentage 57.03%

______________________________________________________________________

30 MARY DRIKAS & PHIL THOMAS

Round 4

vs 41 BLAIR MCKENZIE & KAREN SPARK

EW 16		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section C
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 EW	3 S+1	A	-170	0%	5 EW	4 E=	8	420	25%
2 EW	3NTN+2	3	-660	19%	6 EW	5 xS-2	A	300	0%
3 EW	3 S-1	7	50	50%	7 EW	4 N=	7	-620	38%
4 EW	1NTS-3	4	300	94%	8 EW	3 E-1	10	-50	38%
Percentage 32.81%

______________________________________________________________________

31 SALLY KEELEY & GLORIA RISHWORTH

Round 4

vs 38 ANGELA BARBOUR & SUE MATAS

NS 18		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section C
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 NS	3 S=	A	140	88%	5 NS	4 E+1	5	-450	32%
2 NS	3NTN+1	9	630	25%	6 NS	4 E+1	A	-650	7%
3 NS	2 xW-3	8	800	100%	7 NS	3NTS+1	10	630	82%
4 NS	3 S-1	A	-100	57%	8 NS	3 E-2	A	100	94%
Percentage 60.16%

______________________________________________________________________

32 LYNNE COTTON & CYNTHIA HICKEY

Round 4

vs 39 DIARSHUL & NINDI SANDHU

EW 23		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section C
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 EW	3 W+3	6	170	88%	5 EW	4 E=	8	420	25%
2 EW	4 N+1	5	-650	44%	6 EW	4 E=	A	620	44%
3 EW	3NTS-1	A	50	50%	7 EW	4 S-1	4	100	75%
4 EW	1NTN-3	5	300	94%	8 EW	1NTW=	Q	90	63%
Percentage 60.16%

______________________________________________________________________

33 MARK & SUE LYONS

Round 4

vs 37 JOCELYN ANDREWS & ANGY HENN

NS 17		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section C
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 NS	4 S-1	9	-50	63%	5 NS	4 E+1	8	-450	32%
2 NS	3NTN+3	5	690	100%	6 NS	4 E+1	A	-650	7%
3 NS	4 N-1	2	-50	50%	7 NS	5NTN-3	3	-300	0%
4 NS	2 W=	A	-110	32%	8 NS	3 E=	10	-140	19%
Percentage 37.50%

______________________________________________________________________

34 ANTON & GREGOR FORSTER-ROHAL

Round 4

vs 29 ANN AXELBY & JILL BRAITHWAITE

EW 15		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section C
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 EW	3 E+2	10	150	75%	5 EW	6 xE=	A	1210	100%
2 EW	3NTN+2	J	-660	19%	6 EW	4 E=	K	620	44%
3 EW	3NTS-1	A	50	50%	7 EW	3NTS+2	3	-660	0%
4 EW	2NTE-1	Q	-100	19%	8 EW	3 E-1	10	-50	38%
Percentage 42.97%

______________________________________________________________________

35 HADYN HANNA & ROB MOTTERAM

Round 4

vs 46 SIAN BRIDGES & MEL JONES

EW 20		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section C
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 EW	3 E=	3	110	50%	5 EW	5 E=	Q	450	69%
2 EW	3NTS+1	7	-630	75%	6 EW	4 E=	A	620	44%
3 EW	3NTS-4	A	200	100%	7 EW	2 N+1	7	-140	50%
4 EW	3 E-1	10	-100	19%	8 EW	3 E=	9	140	82%
Percentage 60.94%

______________________________________________________________________

36 NICKY DOWNER & MARIA PANAGIOTIDIS

Round 4

vs 43 ROGER MABLESON & MEGAN WATSON

EW 19		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section C
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 EW	5 E=	10	400	100%	5 EW	4 E=	8	420	25%
2 EW	4 N=	A	-620	100%	6 EW	4 E=	A	620	44%
3 EW	3 S-1	5	50	50%	7 EW	3NTN-1	3	100	75%
4 EW	3 E=	10	110	69%	8 EW	3 E-1	10	-50	38%
Percentage 62.50%

______________________________________________________________________

37 JOCELYN ANDREWS & ANGY HENN

Round 4

vs 33 MARK & SUE LYONS

EW 17		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section C
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 EW	4 S-1	9	50	38%	5 EW	4 E+1	8	450	69%
2 EW	3NTN+3	5	-690	0%	6 EW	4 E+1	A	650	94%
3 EW	4 N-1	2	50	50%	7 EW	5NTN-3	3	300	100%
4 EW	2 W=	A	110	69%	8 EW	3 E=	10	140	82%
Percentage 62.50%

______________________________________________________________________

38 ANGELA BARBOUR & SUE MATAS

Round 4

vs 31 SALLY KEELEY & GLORIA RISHWORTH

EW 18		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section C
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 EW	3 S=	A	-140	13%	5 EW	4 E+1	5	450	69%
2 EW	3NTN+1	9	-630	75%	6 EW	4 E+1	A	650	94%
3 EW	2 xW-3	8	-800	0%	7 EW	3NTS+1	10	-630	19%
4 EW	3 S-1	A	100	44%	8 EW	3 E-2	A	-100	7%
Percentage 39.84%

______________________________________________________________________

39 DIARSHUL & NINDI SANDHU

Round 4

vs 32 LYNNE COTTON & CYNTHIA HICKEY

NS 23		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section C
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 NS	3 W+3	6	-170	13%	5 NS	4 E=	8	-420	75%
2 NS	4 N+1	5	650	57%	6 NS	4 E=	A	-620	57%
3 NS	3NTS-1	A	-50	50%	7 NS	4 S-1	4	-100	25%
4 NS	1NTN-3	5	-300	7%	8 NS	1NTW=	Q	-90	38%
Percentage 39.84%

______________________________________________________________________

40 DENISE CONNOR & FIONA SAGE

Round 4

vs 42 SUE CARTHEW & JOCELYN YOUNG

EW 22		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section C
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 EW	2 W+2	2	130	63%	5 EW	4 E+1	2	450	69%
2 EW	3NTN+1	3	-630	75%	6 EW	4 E=	A	620	44%
3 EW	2NTS-1	4	50	50%	7 EW	4 N-1	7	100	75%
4 EW	4 E-2	10	-200	0%	8 EW	4 E-2	6	-100	7%
Percentage 47.66%

______________________________________________________________________

41 BLAIR MCKENZIE & KAREN SPARK

Round 4

vs 30 MARY DRIKAS & PHIL THOMAS

NS 16		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section C
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 NS	3 S+1	A	170	100%	5 NS	4 E=	8	-420	75%
2 NS	3NTN+2	3	660	82%	6 NS	5 xS-2	A	-300	100%
3 NS	3 S-1	7	-50	50%	7 NS	4 N=	7	620	63%
4 NS	1NTS-3	4	-300	7%	8 NS	3 E-1	10	50	63%
Percentage 67.19%

______________________________________________________________________

42 SUE CARTHEW & JOCELYN YOUNG

Round 4

vs 40 DENISE CONNOR & FIONA SAGE

NS 22		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section C
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 NS	2 W+2	2	-130	38%	5 NS	4 E+1	2	-450	32%
2 NS	3NTN+1	3	630	25%	6 NS	4 E=	A	-620	57%
3 NS	2NTS-1	4	-50	50%	7 NS	4 N-1	7	-100	25%
4 NS	4 E-2	10	200	100%	8 NS	4 E-2	6	100	94%
Percentage 52.34%

______________________________________________________________________

43 ROGER MABLESON & MEGAN WATSON

Round 4

vs 36 NICKY DOWNER & MARIA PANAGIOTIDIS

NS 19		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section C
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 NS	5 E=	10	-400	0%	5 NS	4 E=	8	-420	75%
2 NS	4 N=	A	620	0%	6 NS	4 E=	A	-620	57%
3 NS	3 S-1	5	-50	50%	7 NS	3NTN-1	3	-100	25%
4 NS	3 E=	10	-110	32%	8 NS	3 E-1	10	50	63%
Percentage 37.50%

______________________________________________________________________

44 JACQUIE ARMSTRONG & DEBBIE TROTT

Round 4

vs 45 MARY-ROSE AITKEN & SUSIE LINEHAN

EW 21		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section C
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 EW	2 S=	A	-110	25%	5 EW	3NTW=	2	400	0%
2 EW	4 N+1	6	-650	44%	6 EW	4 E=	A	620	44%
3 EW	3NTS-1	A	50	50%	7 EW	3NTS+1	6	-630	19%
4 EW	2 N-1	2	100	44%	8 EW	2 E+2	6	170	100%
Percentage 40.63%

______________________________________________________________________

45 MARY-ROSE AITKEN & SUSIE LINEHAN

Round 4

vs 44 JACQUIE ARMSTRONG & DEBBIE TROTT

NS 21		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section C
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 NS	2 S=	A	110	75%	5 NS	3NTW=	2	-400	100%
2 NS	4 N+1	6	650	57%	6 NS	4 E=	A	-620	57%
3 NS	3NTS-1	A	-50	50%	7 NS	3NTS+1	6	630	82%
4 NS	2 N-1	2	-100	57%	8 NS	2 E+2	6	-170	0%
Percentage 59.38%

______________________________________________________________________

46 SIAN BRIDGES & MEL JONES

Round 4

vs 35 HADYN HANNA & ROB MOTTERAM

NS 20		FEBRUARY SWISS PAIRS CONGRESS Section C
BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%	BRD	CONTRACT	LEAD	SCORE	%
1 NS	3 E=	3	-110	50%	5 NS	5 E=	Q	-450	32%
2 NS	3NTS+1	7	630	25%	6 NS	4 E=	A	-620	57%
3 NS	3NTS-4	A	-200	0%	7 NS	2 N+1	7	140	50%
4 NS	3 E-1	10	100	82%	8 NS	3 E=	9	-140	19%
Percentage 39.06%

______________________________________________________________________